Friday, December 12, 2014

Observation Assignment #3: Classroom management

I’m back in Diane Morel’s class at Bay View. Today I sat in on one of her tenth grade US History classes. Students start to walk into her room before the bell rings to start the period. They haven’t been assigned seats but they each know where to sit. I imagine that if someone chose to sit somewhere else and “mix things up” that student would be silently hated by everyone else- you don’t mess with the seats once they have been set after the first class or so. To do so is treason. Not to say that this class of girls is particularly ruthless, but from my observations and my own experience I hold this truth to be self-evident. Diane is at her desk, which is in the back right corner of her room, pulling up the attendance page on her computer. The bell rings as the stragglers come in just in time. It takes a minute for everyone to sit down and take out their things. Diane takes attendance orally and gets everyone marked down, even over the buzz of the students.

No papers were distributed or collected, but it did seem like I was viewing a well-oiled machine when the students all opened their iPads within the same minute or so. They take their notes on the iPads, although perhaps two students at the most chose to take the old fashioned route of paper and pen. A student slips in- late. Diane gives her a sharp look; the girl sits down silently and gets ready to join the rest of the group. You can tell that she genuinely does feel bad for being even two minutes late. To begin the class, Diane does some “housekeeping” with the students- she tells them when their tests will be returned and when students should have their projects due. She allows them to speak to her without raising their hands, but this does not make the atmosphere too confusing or crowded.

Once everyone is on the same page, the real class begins. Diane is teaching the class about the aftermath of the election of 1860 in which Abraham Lincoln becomes president. The class is formatted as a lecture with an accompanying powerpoint, but there is plenty of conversation happening. Students frequently raise their hands to ask questions, and Diane is happy to answer them. When a student asks a particularly good question, Diane will stop and take the time to recognize her for her insight. “Amy, that’s a great question. Everyone, did you hear what she asked?” Diane has a fun and sometimes even silly demeanor (doing different voices for historical people, for example) but she can quickly switch her tone to strike a more serious cord effortlessly. The students quiet down to listen to Amy restate her question and only then does Diane answer.

When the students have gotten a little rowdier, in the last 10 minutes or so of class, students favor blurting out answers or questions over raising their hands. At one point a quiet foreign student asks Diane a question, her voice is barely audible. Diane pauses and scolds the class, “You know, its really not fair to Quinn when she is asking me a question and I can’t even hear her. You all should know better, no, really, I’m serious.” The quick break from fun Mrs. Morel who frequently reenacts historical dramas is instantly received by the rest of the class- they’ve realized that they are getting too noisy. It seems that the class so enjoys Diane’s good side and respects her that they really do not want to make her be “mean.” Diane even says it, “you all know that I don’t like to be the bad guy, so don’t make me one.” Then, she turns back into fun Mrs. Morel, answers Quinn’s question, and moves on with the lesson. I think that it really is a strength that she does not let the bad interaction with the class cloud the rest of the lesson.


The bell rings and it is time for everyone to go. Diane reminds the students to put away their textbooks in their class cabinet as everyone leaves. She gives me a slightly tired, but satisfied look. A good class!

Observation Assignment #4

1) What do you think the objective is?

After watching the History Channel’s documentary on the French Revolution, students will be able to identify the major actors and events in the Revolution as well as explain how the French Revolution fits into the greater context of the Enlightenment in Europe.



2) What level of Bloom’s Taxonomy is that?


Comprehension, Analysis


3) How will you assess it in 10 minutes or less?




Name: ____________________________

Date: ______________________________

French Revolution Quiz



Answer each question in at least 2 full sentences


1.     Do Maximillian Robespierre’s actions during the Reign of Terror reflect Enlightenment thinking? Why or why not?


Maximillian Robespierre’s actions during the Reign of Terror do not reflect Enlightenment thinking because he essentially abandoned all reason in favor of violence and paranoia. A reasoned person would be able to work with his compatriots, even if they disagreed with him. Robespierre, however, lost his sense of reason and in the Reign of Terror sent thousands of innocents to the guillotine without proper evidence.


2.     How and why did other monarchies in Europe react to the French Revolution? What event in particular caused them to worry?


Other monarchies in Europe were extremely surprised and worried about the events of the French Revolution. The execution of King Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette at the hands of their own people was unprecedented in Europe, as monarchs were likened to gods. Other monarchs began to worry that if revolution could disturb France that it could ruin their own countries.



3.     How does the execution of Olmype de Gouges for writing the Declaration of the Rights of Woman and Female Citizen demonstrate the limits of the revolutionary ides behind the French Revolution?


The execution of Olympe de Gouges demonstrates that the French Revolution’s lofty ideals about reason and citizenships applied only to males. The fact the de Gouges was executed instead of left alive shows that her ideology of rights for women was a real threat to the patriarchal nature of the revolution. Also, her execution shows that censorship was not abandoned but strengthened during a time when reason was supposed to be the prevailing force in society.